Philosophers on Their Conceptions of Philosophy
Leiter Reports: A Philosophy Blog
http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2010/06/philosophers-on-their-conception-of-philosophy.html...[philosophers] capturing the animating impulse of their work. Thus, Stephen Stich (Rutgers) gives apt expression to the Quinean ethos of his philosophical work:
The idea that philosophy could be kept apart from the sciences would have been dismissed out of hand by most of the great philosophers of the 17th and 18th centuries. But many contemporary philosophers believe they can practice their craft without knowing what is going on in the natural and social sciences. If facts are needed, they rely on their "intuition," or they simply invent them. The results of philosophy done in this way are typically sterile and often silly. There are no proprietary philosophical questions that are worth answering, nor is there any productive philosophical method that does not engage the sciences. But there are lots of deeply important (and fascinating and frustrating) questions about minds, morals, language, culture and more. To make progress on them we need to use anything that science can tell us, and any method that works.
Also mentioned: Photographs of philosophers by Steve Pyke
http://www.pyke-eye.com/galleries/philosophers
Locked
